Friday, July 31, 2026

July 31 The Most Confusing Word in The Bible: Righteous

Psalm 37:12a – "The wicked plot against the righteous..."

       Throughout my lifetime, the most confusing, misunderstood, nebulous word/concept in the entire Bible has been the word "righteous". It is a word that is hardly used outside of religious thinking. There are a few references, however, in secular culture. Do you remember the Righteous Brothers music duo from the 60s onward? The world even uses the phrase "holier-than-thou" to reflect a perceived arrogance of a more-righteous behavior. That latter concept infers that righteous behavior has to do with morality, that built-in understanding of what are right and wrong acts. Behavior is certainly tied to a moral understanding of righteousness.

       In reference to the opening Bible verse, however, "the righteous" is a person or group of people. So, who is the righteous; what makes them righteous; how do they possess righteousness; and what is righteous behavior? A cursory look at David's psalms gives us a contrastive overview of the wicked versus the righteous. A contrastive, but confusing, Psalm 91 also follows that theme. While reading these psalms, many questions arise in my thinking, especially when I contrast David's erratic actions over the course of his 70 years. With that in mind, I don't intend to make this blog an exclusive study of the concept of righteousness. I only want to give an overview and how I was inspired while reading Psalm 91.

       Psalm 91:8 sums up the misfortunes described in verses 5-7, as being the just payment for "the wicked". These misfortunes, however, in reality, happen to all kinds of people and have happened throughout history. Is the protection reflected in Psalm 91:5-8 a definition of hyper-faith? The New Testament has examples of misfortunes happening to Christians. That sentiment is not my theme. As I reflected on "the wicked" in verse 8, I was reminded of Romans 3:10-16. In these compiled references of distinct Old Testament verses, Paul weaves the argument that all people are "wicked" and not righteous. This causes Psalm 91:8 to make perfect sense, because I am the wicked person. It is no wonder then, when my fallen nature (Romans 5:12-14) coincides with living in a fallen world (Romans 8:20-21), that undesirable things happen in my physical life. But I digress yet again, except to say that all of us are wicked individuals, (who may happen to act righteously from time to time; this concept will also play into BEING righteous versus acting righteously.) Then, how do I get righteousness? Let me mention two distinct understandings of the word righteous without trying to back up the definitions with detailed Greek language explanations.

       The word righteous can basically mean two things: 1) being in right-standing with God (a peaceful friendship versus a status of enmity); and 2) behaving in a morally acceptable way towards people and God, which also pleases God. One is a positional or relational righteousness; the other is a practical, action-oriented righteousness.

       Let us work backwards then from the argument in Romans 3, and from the (also confusing-sounding) remedy in 1 Corinthians 1:30 – "It is because of God that you are IN Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God – that is, our righteousness, holiness, and redemption." Our right-standing (relational righteousness) with God is only because Jesus purchased that reconciliation through his atoning death on the cross (Romans 5:6-10). Our faith in that understanding of salvation was also what saved people under the old covenant, despite the fact that Jesus had not yet come to make atonement; the people's faith in the idea that God would forgive their sins, despite their wickedness is clearly shown in David's psalms, not because people could live any way they liked, but because their hearts were already drawn to a loving God. It is God's kindness that leads us to repentance (Romans 2:4), not just under the new covenant, but also in the times and covenants before. See the following for examples of those puzzle pieces: Psalm 32:1; Hebrews 11:7; and Romans 4:1-14, for the intertwining of righteous acts with faith.  

Friday, July 17, 2026

July 17 - Temporary Mission

Luke 10:1 - "Jesus appointed 70 others and sent them two by two ahead of him, to every town and place where he was about to go."  

       Luke 10 tells the story of Jesus sending out 70 persons to towns, ahead of his 
eventual arrival to those towns (verse 1).  The story contains specific commands to these 
70 persons for this particular mission only.  (Cross-reference Luke 18:18-30, which also 
describes a specific command to one person only; conversely, a general command for all 
believers regarding the poor can be found at Matthew 6:1-4).  First, the 70 were 
commanded to "remain" at "whatsoever house they entered (vv 5 & 7)".  
How were they to know what house to enter? We are not told. How long were they to remain in that house? One hour? Till supper was over? Till they left that town? I believe that the latter is the answer. Why would Jesus tell them to "remain" if they were just there for a short visit? The implication is that they were to lodge at someone's house till moving on to the next town, unless the owner's peace returned to them negatively. Then they could pick another house to attempt a welcome lodging. However, they were not to lodge in different houses during their stay in that town (v7) - "Go not from house to house". This is not a prohibition on visiting multiple houses, just moving their lodging from house to house. Remember the context of "remaining". How else could they get out their message if they didn't visit each house? Let's examine some other possibilities. What was their mission? Jesus told them to "heal the sick, and say unto them, 'the kingdom of God has come near to you'." That was all - two things. Later in the chapter (v. 17), we find out that demons were subject to the 70 persons when they used the name of Jesus to drive them out. This implies that exorcism was part of the "healing of the sick". Where did the healings take place? How did they proclaim the nearness of the kingdom of God? We are not told. However, there are some possibilities. First, we could infer that only the house in which they lodged was given the "good news" and healings. Second, they could have preached in the streets or at the market (public places). Third, they could have proclaimed the "good news" in the weekly synagogue meetings. Fourth, they could have gone from house to house, inviting the inhabitants to listen to their message. We don't know, because we are not given the specifics. We also do not know how long was the mission. There is much to be left to the imagination.